Skip to content

Project 02 · January to May 2026

Mitsubishi 6G72 V6 CAD Assembly

A V6 SOHC engine I reverse engineered in SolidWorks from part drawings and reference dimensions. The crankshaft, camshaft, valve train and a 20+ part accessory drive were all modelled and assembled from scratch, and the whole thing mates together and moves.

Cutaway view of the V6 assembly showing pistons, crankshaft, timing belt and both camshafts

Cutaway view of the pistons, crank, timing belt and both cam banks

Unique part types
40+
Cylinders, V-configuration
6
Bore
91.1mm
Stroke
76mm
SolidWorksMotion StudyGD&T / 2D DrawingsReverse Engineering
01

Why this project

I wanted practice at two things the robot arm never made me do. The first was working off real part drawings and reference dimensions instead of designing from a blank sketch. The second was managing an assembly big enough that one mistake in one subsystem, a bore diameter or a journal offset, breaks the way a dozen other parts mate.

The 6G72 was the target, a real Mitsubishi V6 SOHC engine that I worked through feature by feature. That meant the cylinder block, the crankshaft and connecting rods, the camshafts and the full valve train with its rocker arms, followers and springs, the timing belt and cam gears, and the intake and exhaust manifolds. Every dimension came off a reference measurement and got constrained with real geometric mates instead of being eyeballed.

I checked the mechanical motion with a SolidWorks Motion Study, so the crankshaft actually drives the pistons and the valve train through the constraints I built rather than sitting in a static exploded view. I did not get to tolerancing given how long the project ran, so what this shows is the assembly complexity and whether the parts move correctly against each other.

02

How the power flows

The assembly is not a static shell. Every rotating part is constrained to the one before it, so you can step through the chain below and see what drives what.

Combustion drives the pistonsThe crankshaft turns the belt pulleyThe belt synchronizes both cam banksCams push rockers, rockers open valves

Step 1 of 4

Combustion drives the pistons

Each piston travels up and down in its bore with its connecting rod constrained concentric to the crankshaft journal. Six pistons across two banks put rotational force into the crank.

03

Model views

The finished assembly from three angles, with the intake and exhaust manifolds, the timing belt and both cylinder banks all in place.

Isometric view of the V6 assembly

Isometric

Front elevation view of the V6 assembly

Front elevation

Rear isometric view of the V6 assembly

Rear isometric

04

The assembly

SolidWorks screenshots of the model itself, along with a dimensioned 2D drawing and the full exploded view BOM. The photo of the real 6G72 is there for comparison and is not my own work.

05

Motion study

Crankshaft rotation drives the pistons, and through the timing belt and cam gears it drives the full valve train. This is an actual kinematic simulation running off the constraints, not a rendered animation.

SolidWorks Motion Study, slowed to 0.75× so it is easier to follow

06

Key dimensions

Cylinder bore91.1 mm
Cylinder stroke76 mm
Valve spring30–34 mm
Rod journal50 mm
Main journal60 mm
ConfigurationV6, SOHC
07

Bill of materials

Part of the list, which is enough to show how much has to mate correctly before the assembly will move as one system.

PartQty
Engine block1
Crankshaft1
Crank bushing2
Camshaft1
Camshaft (opposite side)1
Valve12
Valve washer12
Rocker arm12
Rocker follower12
Cylinder head2
Cylinder head cover2
Piston (part 1–4 sets)24
Lower block1
Oil pan1
Intake manifold1
Exhaust manifold + mirrored2
Exhaust manifold gasket2
Head gasket2
Cam gear2
Flywheel1
Timing belt1
Pulley2
Air filter1
08

What I'd build next

What this model shows is synchronized mechanical motion, with multiple axes of rotation all driven from a single input and pulleys and gears holding the timing relationships between them.

The obvious next step is the part I left out on purpose, which is the combustion system. Modelling the fuel path, the injectors and the spark timing would take this from a kinematic assembly to something you could actually simulate as a running engine. That is a harder problem than the geometry was, and it is the one I would want to take on next.